Nepalese vs Liberian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Liberian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Liberians
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Liberian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Liberian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 45.5% |
Range | 26.5% | 43.6% |
Mean | 16.0% | 15.7% |
Median | 15.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and Liberians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |