Nepalese vs French American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
French American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
French American Indians
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs French American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,968,938 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nepalese | French American Indian |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 40.0% |
| Range | 26.5% | 39.8% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 17.2% |
| Median | 15.3% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nepalese and French American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (15.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cree (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Laos (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |