Native/Alaskan vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Whites/Caucasians
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,476,258 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 43.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 33.9% |
| Range | 48.2% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 25.5% | 16.7% |
| Median | 23.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.8% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Apache (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |