Luxembourger vs Ute Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Ute
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Ute
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Ute Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,631,125 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,650,694 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 70.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 59.1% |
| Range | 16.3% | 55.6% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 23.3% |
| Median | 6.1% | 17.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 31.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 15.3% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |