Luxembourger vs Swedish Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Swedish
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Luxembourgers
Swedes
9.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Swedish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,526,649 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,141,990 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 0.69%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Swedish |
Minimum | 0.57% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 13.6% | 50.0% |
Range | 13.1% | 49.4% |
Mean | 6.0% | 11.4% |
Median | 6.2% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Swedes by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |