Luxembourger vs Swedish Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Swedish
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Luxembourgers
Swedes
4.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Swedish Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,033,637 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,532,486 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Swedish |
Minimum | 0.50% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 23.6% | 87.9% |
Range | 23.1% | 87.4% |
Mean | 4.4% | 11.3% |
Median | 3.7% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Swedes by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Czech (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Hmong (4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Chinese (4.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and German (4.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Chinese (4.5%, a difference of 0.77%), German (4.5%, a difference of 0.79%), Slovene (4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Hmong (4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Danish (4.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |