Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 6.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 48.4% |
| Range | 44.3% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 16.1% |
| Median | 20.9% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 11.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Cuban (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |