Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,735,156 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,156,159 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.78%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Uruguay
Minimum	2.8%	13.8%
Maximum	87.0%	100.0%
Range	84.2%	86.2%
Mean	27.5%	26.0%
Median	19.6%	18.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.8%	15.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.3%	25.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	18.6%	10.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.6%	23.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.4%	22.1%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Uruguay by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Armenian (18.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (18.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (18.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (18.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (18.6%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Japanese (18.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Europe (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Uruguayan (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Korea	99.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 18.6%
Brazilians	99.8 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 18.7%
Immigrants \| Haiti	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 18.7%
Armenians	99.7 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 18.7%
Lithuanians	99.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 18.7%
Hawaiians	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 18.7%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 18.8%
Costa Ricans	99.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Europe	99.5 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 18.8%
Uruguayans	99.5 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 18.8%
Palestinians	99.5 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 18.8%
Japanese	99.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 18.9%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 18.9%