Latvian vs Zimbabwean Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Latvian
Zimbabwean
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Latvians
Zimbabweans
9.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Zimbabwean Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,272,537 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,670 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 4.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 35.1% | 14.9% |
| Range | 34.9% | 14.3% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 8.1% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Zimbabweans by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Turkish (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian (9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |