Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Immigrants from Hong Kong
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,152,148 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 1.00% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 13.9% |
Range | 14.1% | 13.5% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |