Immigrants from Scotland vs Burmese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Burmese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Burmese
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Burmese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,152,148 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 7.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Burmese |
Minimum | 1.00% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 29.5% |
Range | 14.1% | 28.8% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.3% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Burmese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Korea (7.4%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |