Immigrants from Ghana vs Mexican American Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Mexican American Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Mexican American Indians
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Mexican American Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,808,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,505,642 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.97%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 0.71% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 40.5% | 51.0% |
Range | 39.8% | 49.9% |
Mean | 13.4% | 15.9% |
Median | 12.2% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Mexican American Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (14.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |