Immigrants from Ghana vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Alaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Alaskan Athabascans
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,808,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 40.5% | 62.3% |
| Range | 39.8% | 61.2% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 19.9% |
| Median | 12.2% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 26.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Alaskan Athabascans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (13.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |