Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
14.6%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,967,480 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Cherokee |
Minimum | 4.1% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 31.4% | 54.1% |
Range | 27.3% | 52.4% |
Mean | 15.0% | 19.3% |
Median | 13.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Cherokee by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Liberia (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |