Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Cherokee
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,939,480 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.5%.
![Immigrants from Cuba vs Cherokee Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/immigrants-from-cuba-vs-cherokee-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Cherokee |
Minimum | 4.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 33.8% | 61.8% |
Range | 29.5% | 59.5% |
Mean | 16.4% | 21.9% |
Median | 15.0% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Cherokee by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.080%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |