Immigrants from China vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Czech
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Immigrants from China
Czechs
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Czech Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,770,317 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,652,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 3.7%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Czech |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 21.7% | 38.7% |
| Range | 20.6% | 38.3% |
| Mean | 8.1% | 8.3% |
| Median | 7.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Czechs by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Cambodian (9.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Bhutanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |