Immigrants from Argentina vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Puget Sound Salish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Puget Sound Salish
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,332,384 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 32.3% | 26.7% |
Range | 30.4% | 23.1% |
Mean | 12.9% | 13.0% |
Median | 11.7% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Puget Sound Salish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |