Immigrants from China vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Puget Sound Salish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Puget Sound Salish
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 2.6% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 26.7% |
Range | 23.9% | 23.1% |
Mean | 11.9% | 13.0% |
Median | 11.5% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Puget Sound Salish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |