Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Germany Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Germany
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Germany
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Germany Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,610,140 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 9.8%.
![Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Germany Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/alaskan-athabascans-vs-immigrants-from-germany-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Germany |
Minimum | 0.78% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 69.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.2% | 92.5% |
Mean | 21.7% | 23.6% |
Median | 15.9% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 28.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 20.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 20.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |