Hungarian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Chippewa
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
39.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,502,236 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 26.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 94.0% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 31.6% | 38.7% |
| Median | 22.7% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.1% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.8% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hungarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |