Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chippewa
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
36.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,424,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 26.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.1% | 11.9% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 87.6% |
Range | 50.2% | 75.7% |
Mean | 19.1% | 38.7% |
Median | 19.4% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 26.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 47.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |