Aleut vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Chippewa
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 5.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 92.3% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 37.3% | 38.7% |
| Median | 29.8% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.1% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |