Houma vs Czech Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Czech
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Houma
Czechs
33.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Czech Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,729,698 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825 and weighted average of 33.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 60.6%.
![Houma vs Czech Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/houma-vs-czechs-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Czech |
Minimum | 13.4% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 94.8% | 80.9% |
Range | 81.5% | 74.1% |
Mean | 39.1% | 29.6% |
Median | 33.0% | 25.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.8% | 36.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.7% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Houma by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.92%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 2.4%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |