Senegalese vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Senegalese
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Senegalese
Marshallese
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Senegalese vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,927,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Senegalese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Senegalese | Marshallese |
Minimum | 4.5% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 52.6% | 56.5% |
Range | 48.1% | 40.3% |
Mean | 22.3% | 28.7% |
Median | 22.7% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.2% | 34.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Senegalese and Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Senegalese are Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |