Inupiat vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Inupiat
Marshallese
23.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,986,972 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 0.69%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Marshallese |
Minimum | 8.3% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 73.6% | 56.5% |
Range | 65.3% | 40.3% |
Mean | 30.3% | 28.7% |
Median | 24.4% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 34.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.1% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |