Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age 30-34
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,938,497 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 85.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Romania and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Romania influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Immigrants from Romania simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Hungary (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Scotland (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Egyptian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 96.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 95.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Argentineans | 95.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 94.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 94.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Egyptians | 94.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 94.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 52.6% |
| Maximum | 12.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 12.2% | 47.4% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 85.6% |
| Median | 1.9% | 85.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.91% | 82.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 89.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 9.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Romania Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 129,779,390 | 84.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 50,824,366 | 85.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 35,123,256 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 15,178,101 | 86.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 7,232,149 | 85.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 5,104,568 | 85.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 3,618,706 | 86.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 2,247,268 | 84.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 1,759,971 | 85.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 1,532,035 | 84.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 767,239 | 83.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 623,413 | 85.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 686,289 | 85.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 293,064 | 82.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 523,522 | 85.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 274,214 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 114,083 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 132,567 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 77,806 | 78.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 191,823 | 85.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 50,767 | 83.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 181,360 | 80.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 52,825 | 78.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.46% | 54,250 | 82.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 36,802 | 85.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 5,648 | 91.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 12,050 | 95.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 6,169 | 86.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 66,164 | 82.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 7,828 | 89.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 93,713 | 80.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 61,136 | 84.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 65,890 | 88.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 11,056 | 81.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 41,134 | 83.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 11,062 | 83.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 523 | 77.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 2,369 | 83.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 27,951 | 63.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 14,652 | 79.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,125 | 78.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,814 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 1,048 | 79.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 852 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 26,939 | 87.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 1,194 | 92.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 909 | 68.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 3,064 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.52% | 426 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 1,899 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 5,555 | 62.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 69 | 76.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 1,153 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.59% | 676 | 52.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 532 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 98 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.55% | 412 | 100.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.10% | 1,885 | 99.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 1,668 | 100.0% |