Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Jordanian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,400,430 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 85.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.83% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Jordanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Jordanians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Jordanians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Chinese (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants from Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants from Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants from Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants from Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
Jordanian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
Minimum | 0.034% | 58.3% |
Maximum | 8.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 8.4% | 41.7% |
Mean | 2.6% | 85.6% |
Median | 2.1% | 86.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 82.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 89.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 8.1% |
Correlation Details
Jordanian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 122,913,844 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 22,174,467 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 8,457,233 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 3,366,782 | 86.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 2,328,545 | 85.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 2,327,290 | 86.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 861,646 | 82.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 672,003 | 83.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 663,275 | 85.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 480,928 | 83.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 434,656 | 86.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 443,461 | 80.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 82,250 | 85.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 112,755 | 80.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 154,050 | 88.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 190,537 | 88.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 119,427 | 76.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 117,444 | 88.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 22,769 | 87.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 43,541 | 81.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 39,861 | 86.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 50,561 | 85.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 11,189 | 93.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 1,155 | 58.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 31,259 | 72.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 14,915 | 95.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 55,025 | 83.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 23,173 | 88.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 38,144 | 87.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 17,280 | 70.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 3,317 | 94.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 8,535 | 89.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 3,532 | 99.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,804 | 93.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 12,305 | 91.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 11,977 | 89.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 38,010 | 90.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 8,220 | 75.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 20,564 | 71.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.92% | 1,381 | 99.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 9,960 | 89.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 6,496 | 76.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 8,024 | 86.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 400 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 182 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 10,258 | 79.3% |