Laotian vs Bhutanese Family Households
COMPARE
Laotian
Bhutanese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Laotians
Bhutanese
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Bhutanese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,743,344 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.13%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 54.7% | 36.6% |
| Maximum | 96.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.1% | 63.4% |
| Mean | 71.8% | 69.5% |
| Median | 69.9% | 69.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 64.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.3% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |