Israeli vs Latvian Family Households
COMPARE
Israeli
Latvian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Israelis
Latvians
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Latvian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,999,520 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 63.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,652,081 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.57%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Latvian |
| Minimum | 46.6% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 92.3% |
| Range | 53.4% | 61.3% |
| Mean | 73.6% | 65.1% |
| Median | 70.5% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.4% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.5% | 70.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Latvians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Singapore (63.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (63.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Austria (63.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (63.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Turkey (63.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and New Zealander (62.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |