Israeli vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Israeli
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Israelis
Immigrants from Oceania
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,999,520 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 63.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 2.8%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 46.6% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
| Range | 53.4% | 82.6% |
| Mean | 73.6% | 64.5% |
| Median | 70.5% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.4% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.5% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Western Africa (63.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Colville (63.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (63.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Cheyenne (63.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Kenyan (63.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cypriots | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Kenyans | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Colville | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 0.3 /100 | #272 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 0.3 /100 | #273 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.3 /100 | #274 | Tragic 63.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |