Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,476,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.20%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 27.3% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 89.0% |
| Range | 72.7% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 65.5% | 66.3% |
| Median | 64.6% | 65.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.2% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |