Aleut vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Aleut
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Aleuts
Sub-Saharan Africans
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,774,066 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 19.2% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 80.8% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 66.1% | 62.5% |
| Median | 65.4% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.7% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.9% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |