Cambodian vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Cambodian
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cambodians
Sub-Saharan Africans
61.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,469,130 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 61.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cambodian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 37.8% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 82.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.4% | 67.4% |
Mean | 60.1% | 62.5% |
Median | 59.9% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 52.6% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Kiowa (61.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Black/African American (61.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Indonesian (61.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |