Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Chickasaw
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,951,250 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 17.8%.
![Yup'ik vs Chickasaw Vision Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/vision-disability/yupik-vs-chickasaw-vision-disability-chart.webp)
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 8.3% | 15.2% |
Range | 7.4% | 14.8% |
Mean | 3.3% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.7% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Osage (2.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Alaska Native (2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Inupiat (2.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 2.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.6% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.6% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |