Immigrants from Hungary vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,649,550 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.26% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 3.7% | 15.2% |
Range | 3.5% | 14.8% |
Mean | 1.9% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.76% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.75% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |