Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,324,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 52.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.21% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 7.9% | 15.2% |
Range | 7.7% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |