Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,113,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 55.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.62% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 9.5% | 15.2% |
Range | 8.9% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.4% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Somalia (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |