Swiss vs Samoan Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Samoan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Swiss
Samoans
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Samoan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,125,318 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.63%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Samoan |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 40.6% | 32.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 28.8% |
Mean | 12.9% | 13.1% |
Median | 12.1% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Samoans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Malaysian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Italian (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), West Indian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Bahamian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
West Indians | 2.9 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.2% |
Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |