Swiss vs British Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
British
Disability
Disability Comparison
Swiss
British
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs British Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.040%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | British |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 40.6% | 98.5% |
Range | 37.9% | 95.0% |
Mean | 12.9% | 21.7% |
Median | 12.1% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and British by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |