Slavic vs British Disability
COMPARE
Slavic
British
Disability
Disability Comparison
Slavs
British
12.4%
DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs British Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,861,742 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | British |
Minimum | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 70.6% | 98.5% |
Range | 67.1% | 95.0% |
Mean | 17.8% | 21.7% |
Median | 14.0% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.9% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and British by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Canadian (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Slovene (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |
Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.4% |
Slavs | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.4% |
Canadians | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.4% |