South American Indian vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Uruguayan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Uruguayans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.90%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 23.8% |
Range | 14.2% | 20.9% |
Mean | 6.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Uruguayans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |