New Zealander vs Latvian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Latvian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Latvians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Latvian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,879,653 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.56%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Latvian |
Minimum | 0.21% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 10.4% |
Range | 11.9% | 10.1% |
Mean | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.97% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Latvians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Cameroon (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Japan (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belgium (2.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.3% |
New Zealanders | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Palestinians | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Mongolians | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Swedes | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.3% |