Burmese vs Latvian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Latvian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Burmese
Latvians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Latvian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,418,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 0.23% |
| Maximum | 9.0% | 10.4% |
| Range | 8.3% | 10.1% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.51% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Latvians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |