Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Chinese
15.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,516,181 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 48.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Chinese |
Minimum | 5.3% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 36.2% | 33.9% |
Range | 31.0% | 29.7% |
Mean | 20.1% | 12.1% |
Median | 20.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Pueblo (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Cherokee (15.5%, a difference of 0.95%), Navajo (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |