White/Caucasian vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Chinese
12.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,010,909 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 22.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Chinese |
Minimum | 10.1% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 33.9% |
Range | 9.7% | 29.7% |
Mean | 13.4% | 12.1% |
Median | 12.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Subsaharan African (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Dominica (12.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Spanish (12.7%, a difference of 0.44%), French (12.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and Marshallese (12.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
English | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.4% |
German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.5% |
Malaysians | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.5% |
Senegalese | 0.5 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.5% |
Marshallese | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.7% |
Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.7% |
French | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.7% |
Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |