Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Arabs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,357,808 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.42%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Arab |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 17.8% |
Range | 18.1% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.3% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |