Immigrants from Western Asia vs Arab Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Arab
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Arabs
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Arab Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,612,258 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Arab |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 12.5% | 17.8% |
Range | 9.3% | 15.3% |
Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Arabs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |