Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
11.6%
DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,728,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,035 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Minimum | 5.2% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 29.6% |
Range | 15.3% | 26.0% |
Mean | 11.4% | 13.2% |
Median | 11.3% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Fiji (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Netherlands (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ghana (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Kenya (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Romanians | 72.7 /100 | #150 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 72.1 /100 | #151 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 72.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 71.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 71.1 /100 | #154 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 69.8 /100 | #155 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 69.5 /100 | #156 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 11.6% |
Armenians | 65.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.6% |
Guatemalans | 65.1 /100 | #159 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 64.2 /100 | #160 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 62.8 /100 | #161 | Good 11.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 59.2 /100 | #162 | Average 11.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 58.9 /100 | #163 | Average 11.7% |
Syrians | 58.5 /100 | #164 | Average 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Congo (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Yup'ik (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Inupiat | 2.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.2% |
Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |