Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chinese
61.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chinese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,657,833 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 61.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%, a difference of 10.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chinese |
Minimum | 38.1% | 47.5% |
Maximum | 80.2% | 82.6% |
Range | 42.1% | 35.1% |
Mean | 63.6% | 68.6% |
Median | 62.7% | 69.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |