Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Asia Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from Asia
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Immigrants from Asia
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
93.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Asia Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,498,120 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,490,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.90%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.037% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 25.8% |
Range | 4.9% | 25.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 2.6% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 0.44% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.87% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.87% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Asia by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Serbian (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovene (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Greek (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and British (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Croatians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Alsatians | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Bhutanese | 94.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 94.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Greeks | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Slovenes | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 93.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Serbians | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Scandinavians | 93.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.4% |